Home
Bike Reviews
Yamaha MT03 (2016) Test Ride Review
Review Date February 2016
By Ren Withnell
Back in August 2014 I had the pleasure of riding Yamaha's MT07 at their open day in Manchester (Yamaha MT07 "Darkside" Review). I liked the engine in that bike an awful lot and the chassis was very good except for the seat which was more akin to a plank of wood. I suggested Yamaha might do well to stick that motor in a big trailie style bike. Yamaha, who of course read intently every word I write upon this website, took my advice and created the Tracer. Silly boys - they used the wrong engine! They used that silly big daft triple 900 not the sweet punchy twin 700. I try I tell ya, I do try.
Today I find myself outside a particularly soggy Chorley Yamaha staring at the all new MT03 this time. WARNING! Do not confuse the old MT03 with the new one. The old one had a 660 single engine from the XT and the Tenere, a trick side mounted rear shock and brutal looks. The new MT03 has a 321cc twin cylinder engine taken out of the R3, is not as mean looking and completely different. Thank you Yamaha, this has already caused confusion among my motorcycling friends and I'm sure the confusion will continue elsewhere.
The new MT03 - not to be confused with the old one.
So what have we got? Twin pot parallel twin motor, liquid cooling, steel frame, one brake disc and Yamaha's distinctive "Darkside" styling. It's not a bad looking bike, I don't think it's as radical as the old MT03 and I'm not sure about the tank shape or the angular back end. Still, anyone that knows me will know I have no real sense of the aesthetic so decide for yourself whether or not you think it's pretty or cool.
It's OK, but it's not as mean looking as the outoging MT03.
I step onto the MT03 to find the seat height is plenty low enough for my 5'8" frame with both feet flat on the floor and then some. I start it up and I have to ask myself "Is this a single?" Thud thud thud thud, the pipes rumble beneath me in a manner too slow for a twin and they're surprisingly loud. We're not talking "wake the neighbours" loud, this is a street legal and fully homologated product but I can hear Yammy's spent some time making it sound pretty butch at the traffic lights. I cannot find anything online regarding the crank as yet (180, 270 or 360 degree) but it sounds like a fruity single. How odd, I mean that in a good way.
It's a twin...it doesn't sound like a twin but it is, honestly!
As I set off the next thing I duly note is the riding position. For myself at my height I'd have to say it's spot on. I am upright but not quite "sit up and beg", I'm canted forward a touch but not "ooooohhh me wrists". The pegs are sensibly located and everything falls to my control as I'd expect. Except the rear brake, but that's because my own rear brake is all to cock, not the bike's fault. Yes, I am happy here.
Then WHOOSH! Whoa! hold up a minute, this is a 321cc motor, basically a jumped up 250, where the hell did that come from? Now please bear in mind everything is relative. The MT07 felt like - I quote - "I've been rear-ended by a truck doing 100 mph when I open the throttle". The MT03 does not have the same organ displacing acceleration but hell's bells it sure can bugger off down the road sharp enough. I reign my wrist back in, perhaps I've been riding 125s and knackered old 250s for too long now. The world has moved on without me.
I can't figure it out though. Through town keeping the revs in the comfortable mid range this is one pokey little motor, much more akin to a thumper single. Then out in the countryside those revs keep on feeding in more and more power like a four cylinder motor. Yamaha has really pulled some magic out of the 2 x 160.5cc pistons. They've made a 321cc single in the low to mid range and a 321cc four at the top end. How? It's ridiculous. It makes the CBF 250 I rode to Chorley pale into insignificance that's what it does.
There be some modern trickery and jiggery-pokery going on in here.
On new tyres (7 miles) and in the pouring rain I am not going to be able to tell you about knee down roundabouts or apex hugging handling. Suffice to say given a sensible wet weather pace nothing scared me and bends could be taken with confidence. In fact it all feels very neutral, comfortable and while I doubt Yamaha ever intended it to be, relaxing.
I hop onto the motorway. I am riding into a forceful headwind with rain so hard my visor is in fact now clear. Aha! Thankfully I learn the engine is not immortal or magic. Here as I plough through the tempest at 70mph it is finally starting to struggle. There is a little left on the throttle but not much. However I must not be dismissive. On a windless and dry day the motor ought to pull the legal limit all day long and climb high enough to lose your licence should you so wish. In these conditions my 125 would be barely making 40mph and a 500 would have the throttle open. It's a hell of a day for a test ride. The chassis is completely stable even against the gusts.
Back in town Chorley provides roundabouts, traffic lights and tail-gaters. The MT03 handles all this as politely as vicar at a funeral, all the while being ready to pounce with a flick of the twist grip. I return to the bike shop and spend a moment in the car park doing U-Turns and figures of 8. I am impressed at it's stability and ease of use in a wide range of conditions.
So what have Yamaha created? Possibly one of the best and most exciting commuter class motorcycles ever! What...wait...isn't that a contradiction in terms like Military Intelligence? Commuter motorcycles are supposed to be dull and sensible for trudging through traffic and the MT03 will be just that if you wish. Then by tweaking the throttle it will shoot you off into the sunset with a big daft grin. No, you're never going to beat the big boys although I think you'll have a great time keeping up with them.
As with the MT07 what has amazed me the most is the engine. Somehow Yamaha is managing to spread torque and power across the rev range in a most refreshing and pleasing manner. The 321 motor feels visceral, lively and fun while still remaining easy to ride and less likely to bite.
The boring stuff...Clocks are clear to read with a gear indicator. There's no fairing and no weather protection. 2 pot 1 disc up front with ABS, all works as it should. Normal way up forks - nothing wrong with that. I like the way the rear shock is protected from the road muck. Yada...yada...yada...
The shock is kept away from the worst of the weather.
For me personally? It would be a fun and joyful machine to own and ride, light and nimble, relaxing and chilled and then when called for it would be gripping and wild. And yet 2 things will let it down. Firstly the fuel economy. I'll wait until more owners join fuelly.com before I'm certain but the R3 and a handful of MT03's suggest around the 70mpg mark so far. Compared to Honda's CB500 and NC750 range giving 80mpg for more bike and more power it seems thirsty. Perhaps the current owners are thrashing them, I don't know. Secondly the rear end doesn't look saddle bag friendly. That said - Yamaha already list a rack for it so there's hope...
Did someone say Tenere 321? Tracer 321? Ooooh yes please, give me 85mpg while you're at it.
Reader's Comments
Bob said :-
Thanks for another real world (as opposed to paid journo world) review.
I was skeptical of your comments on performance until you got to the bit about 70MPH into a headwind. Sounds about right given the claimed power and torque figures.
What we need is 500cc twins, like we used to have before the EU killed them off.
I've got a KLE500 and that is all the bike required.
By the way, your comment on the MT07 engine going into a traily might come true, EU regs have killed off the XT660 this year and there are persistent rumours of it returning with a detuned MT07 lump - that will be good.
01/03/2016 16:19:43 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi Bob. Compared to other 250s I have ridden the MT03 is one seriously impressive motor. Of course it is all relative, a 321 engine is never going to out-drag a 500 plus. Yet I do maintain what Yamaha have achieved with the cubes is notable.
Apart from Honda's CB500F/X/R range there are not many 500 twins right now. We seem to presently be polarised by the new 250-320 models or big chunky things. Let us start a mid-range revolution!
MT07 detuned trailie...mmmmmmm...here take my money
01/03/2016 18:47:00 UTC
Daf said :-
I'm so glad you reviewed this bike as I've had my eye on it since before it was even released - ever since they created the R3. It looks like the ideal replacement for ,y Inazuma when the time comes though the petrol consumption (if it is only 70) is a bit disappointing. How revvy was it? Was it as frantic as the inazuma at speed?
01/03/2016 19:03:56 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi Daf. Revs wise I did make a note - 70mph = 7,000 revs, 60 = 6k and so on and so on in top gear. If memory serves me well that makes it a little less revvy than the 'Zuma.
Economy - well I suspect those with the R3 and brand new MT03s will be giving it the beans. We'll need much more data to establish a sensible figure. I do think it will use more than the 'Zuma as it is more highly tuned. That said it is a little lighter so that will help.
01/03/2016 21:47:14 UTC
Daf said :-
Yep, the 'Zuma does 8K at 68 Mph. Revvy little thing. This seems a bit lower on the revs. The Zuma is even revvier than the CBF250.
Unfortunately it's the same with rides running engines ragged... On Fuelly, every bike I've entered onto that site has been either the best economy, or close to the top of the pile because I don't go nuts... If I wanted to do that I'd get an R1.
05/03/2016 23:07:45 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
I guess we have to appreciate that for most folks a motorcycle is a weekend play thing as opposed to everyday transport. As such they're for thrashing and no concern is given to longevity or economy. We are in the minority.
I find my CBF250 runs around 8k at 70mph. I recall you upgeared your 250, perhaps you could do the same for the 'Zuma?
05/03/2016 23:55:54 UTC
Samm said :-
Thanks for the useful review. Back to biking after a long break would the MT 03 fit the bill as a good confidence builder stepping stone to the MT07 or SV650? For local fair weather trips only.
30/07/2016 09:45:27 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi Samm. I'm sure the MT03 would be just the ticket. The motor's powerful enough to entertain but not crazy. What were you riding before your "long break"? If it was a CG125 then you'll be in for a shock, if it was a GPZ900 then the MT03 will ease you back in nicely.
The MT07 will come as something of a shock even if you did have a GPZ900, there's a lot of poke in that there motor.
30/07/2016 18:51:54 UTC
Samm said :-
Thank you. Last bike was a 125 many years ago. Going against dealers pushing me towards a bigger bike I'm hoping the new MT 20 should be good for a year or two to get back into it before looking at upgrading. Also very important to me is low maintenance and reliability.
31/07/2016 05:45:48 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi Samm. If you've only ever ridden 125s then the MT03 will be quite quick relative to the 125s. Yamaha know how to make motorcycles and the MT03 will *probably* come with 2 years warranty so long as you stick to the service schedule. Do make sure you take servicing costs into your budget, they can be quite expensive.
The MT03 is a cracking bike but don't dismiss the competition. The Z250SL Sharon has recently purchased is a fabulous machine too and considerably cheaper. If you're looking for comfort and price the Suzuki Inazuma is a solid bike with some good deals on it. Honda's CBR300 is worth a look if you like the sports bike style.
31/07/2016 07:36:34 UTC
Samm said :-
More research completed, thank you for your suggestions. I do have a small doubt about the MT03 which is just a niggling feeling and probably not scientific but nonetheless there. I have thus re-visited the Inazuma, having discounted it in the early days. I am now seeing this could actually be the one. Plus local nearby Szki Dealer I have a good relationship wish. Concern : weight is 182kg v MT03's very attractive 168kg.
My wish / wish not list : not to stall easily, easy to ride off at stops, easy to ride, not to drop it when parking, easy to park :-) , looks impressive (achieved as 250 not plastered on the side), good with town riding ie manoeuvrability. Doubt I'll ever have a need to go above 3rd. Can a novice manage it well in the early days. Great plus is the high equipment level incl gear indicator. A lot of above is down to practice and skill and not the bike I know. Just looking for every bit of help for first months...
31/07/2016 16:44:43 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Sounds like you're really nervous Samm. It also looks like you're about to spend several thousand pounds. Is it not worth spending a few pounds getting a refresher lesson with a local training school? It certainly can't do any harm and it'd be great to ease you back into riding once more.
If you're really really nervous then maybe get a cheap 125 for a few months! Buy a second hand one, put a few thousand miles on it then sell it on for the same price.
They all stall, they all fall over, they're all a pig to move. If it's been a while then perhaps not shelling out several thousand pounds until you've had a practice on someone else's bike or a cheap one of your own?
01/08/2016 21:03:54 UTC
Samm said :-
Yep, reached same conclusion. Lessons booked and will hire a 125 for about a month (there's a shop near here that does them pretty cost effectively) and then I think I'll be on my way. Thanks for all your advice :-)
02/08/2016 17:16:27 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Enjoy it Samm and there's no rush. You can never have too much training and after 26 years of riding I still run 12-15 thousand miles a year on my 125.
03/08/2016 17:33:56 UTC
Alexander said :-
Whilst agreeing with most comments there are a couple of minor criticisms. First I have found the seat is quite hard for a decent ride it also throws me forward into the tank which is quite uncomfortable. The arms of the wing mirrors are too short, I see more of my arms than that which is following me. The features I think are quite crucial to the safety of the bike.
26/08/2016 18:33:32 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Cheers Alexander, that's some really useful information. I only had a test ride so I didn't get to sit on the seat for a long long time to really draw a conclusion. Comfort is a very personal thing as we're all different shapes. I kind of like being pushed into the tank but many folks don't. I didn't notice the mirrors being too close, I suspect you're probably taller than I am.
If only we could have 2 day long test rides! An hour is never really long enough to find out about comfort and to eek out all those niggles.
I'd love to hear how you get on with the bike over time. Is it reliable, is it economical, it it fun and all those sorts of things. Do let us know :)
27/08/2016 09:10:25 UTC
Ian said :-
Ive had the MT03 for 6 months now and I am blown away by this little gem, very light and great on the bends and in the city. Fuel economy is a bit disappointing but It looks amazing and is a blast to ride. ***** Five stars :):):):):) brings a smile to my face.
10/10/2016 11:45:48 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
That's great to hear Ian! I was impressed with the combination of great manners and great performance. What fuel consumption are you getting?
10/10/2016 20:56:14 UTC
DaveS said :-
I have just traded my CBR300R-AF for a MT03, there has been a massive recall on the CBR's due to crankshaft/main bearings problems. Currently happening in Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. Although not over here yet, but buyer be aware. Check the CBR300 forum.com for details from owners.
12/10/2016 12:19:07 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Yikes! Not like Honda that. I've had a read of the forum and yeah it seems mostly the Americas and Oz. I very very much doubt Honda has specific production for those countries though so I wonder when they'll start recalling the UK models.
Sharon was considering the CBR300, perhaps that was a close shave.
13/10/2016 16:38:08 UTC
Fran said :-
I've just purchased a mt03 as my day commuter bike for my 20km ride to work. I've been using my vfr800 and finally got round to getting something smaller and easier on the commute.
The vfr is great for long distance rides, especially with 2 up, but I feel the mt will be great for filtering through the traffic and dealing with the basic stupidity of other drivers. Lol
I took it for a test ride today, and I was very impressed with how well it went, especially once giving it some beans. The brakes felt a little soft, but still brought the bike up nicely, and the abs will be helpful. I am comparing the lighter bike with 1 disc and 2 pots vs the much heaver vfr with 2 discs and 6 pots, plus linked brakes.
Should be getting the bike around Friday or Saturday this week.
Cheers
02/05/2017 05:19:44 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi Fran. Yeah, I reckon the MT03 will be a little easier to manage than the VFR800 in the sprawling metropolis. You'll still have plenty of poke when you need it but it'll be lighter and more nimble too.
I'd like to hear what sort of fuel economy you get and if possible how well the bike ages as the miles increase and the newness wears off. It's one thing to test ride a motorcycle it's another thing entirely to put 20,000 miles of dirty streets and rain soaked commuting onto it.
02/05/2017 07:56:26 UTC
Dave S said :-
Ren: Update on the Honda CBR300, there is now a worldwide recall; I received a letter from Honda UK to arrange the remedial works to be carried out on the crank & main bearings to be replaced under warranty. So pleased I got rid of mine and should of really pushed Honda for a refund.
My MT03 is now a year old and other than a recall on the clutch bearing although mine was fine a replacement was fitted in under an hour whilst having a coffee at my dealer.
I have fitted a fender extender to stop any crud going on the exhaust headers, also a radiator guard (Yamaha). A set of SW Motech soft luggage/brackets and a set of engine crash bars, the bike is still going like a dream and very pleased with my purchase as it does everything I need.
05/11/2017 09:21:04 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Cheers Dave S! I'm glad you're enjoying the MT03.
How many miles have you put on the MT03 now?
06/11/2017 11:28:03 UTC
Martin said :-
I've been riding my MT-03 for 6 months now.
I came from riding dirt bikes forever, to the road for the first time on the MT.
I dropped it 3 times in the first month. The first time I stalled it turning into a side street, going too slow in 2nd. Just stepped off the bike as it laid over. Lots of embarrassment and several pissed off car drivers. The 2nd time was practicing figure 8s in a car park. I hit the bitumen hard but no probs otherwise. The 3rd time was just moving it around at home.
I'm 5'7" and 68kg and find the bike very comfortable. I can ride for hours without getting any sore bits.
The MT-03 beats most things off the lights, which is great for safety. It'll beat some big Harleys even, though that may be the rider more than the bike. Of course it doesn't stand a chance against VFR's or similar.
Filtering through traffic is a breeze.
Fuel consumption isn't the best. The tank gauge is down to 1 bar after about 250klms, which I think is a little thirsty.
I'm no expert on handling, but the MT is very forgiving. Direction changes mid corner are easy. Manoeuvring through traffic is a breeze. Throttle response is immediate. Braking through engine compression only is actually amazing. It will happily sit on 110klm on the freeway.
Overall, I love the bike.
27/04/2018 01:17:32 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Thanks Martin - it's great to hear from someone who actually owns and is living with the bike.
The motor is a punchy little thing ain't it! Around town you'll certainly keep up with everything if not leave it far behind. I was surprised how well it forced it's way through a very strong headwind too.
I wonder how other riders are getting on with the fuel consumption? Are you heavy with the throttle?
27/04/2018 08:19:05 UTC
Andy H said :-
I am an older, mature motorcyclist, 5ft 5" short arse, have had bigger bikes in the past, bought an MT03 with 500 miles on the clock for 3k, well impressed, light, handles beautifully and goes when you open the throttle, only use it on dry summer days or Sat/Sun blasts, use an SH300i for winter commuting due to protection and ease of use of scooters. Will keep my MT03 for sunny commutes and the fun factor this bike surprisingly gives me due to its light weight and awesome 321cc engine, a revelation, get 67-70 mpg, cheap to buy, insure and service, which is just fine by me.
24/08/2018 15:04:47 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Sounds idyllic Andy H. The scoot is an ideal commuter and the MT03 a fabulous plaything. I think you've rather spoilt yourself.
Actually I estimate you've got the best of both worlds for less than the price of a big daft sportsbike. Well done you.
25/08/2018 07:26:15 UTC
said :-
I think the best begginer bike. 10 days now i enjoy her.
20/09/2018 07:27:42 UTC
MP said :-
Forget my name. MP
20/09/2018 07:30:45 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Cheers MP. Yes as a motorcycle for those who've recently passed their test and are stepping up to a larger model the MT03 is a great choice. There's enough power to get you into trouble but not the ridiculous "just look at the throttle and it will kill you" of some bikes.
Even so speaking as a very experienced rider the MT03 is still an excellent bike. It's plenty fast enough for public roads and it has more than enough pace, handling and looks to appeal to any rider.
Enjoy your ride MP, keep safe.
20/09/2018 07:53:33 UTC
MP said :-
Thank you.
The power is more than enough for first bike but not scary. Because is new until 1000 km I only reach 6000 rpm and goes pretty fast. Excellent suspension, easy handling, plus gear indicator.
But (oh yes there is a but) in the city I prefer my burgman 200.mt03 I have it only for weekend to go for a country ride. Open highway roads. 100 120 km/h I enjoy her.
Ride safe everybody.
20/09/2018 16:15:15 UTC
MP said :-
First service 1000km with mt03. 45 euro cost. All OK.
Excellent first bike.
12/11/2018 20:04:29 UTC
Upt'North said :-
Just read this thread, seems a lovely LITTLE BIKE.
It strikes me as very strange being someone who rode GT250's, RD400's in the 70's that we consider 40 bhp bikes as little.
When "in the day" you turned up on a new RD400 and were treated like a riding god, someone who could tame the beast. No not that beast. Behave at the back.
I do think it's great that these bikes are around, together with CB500's etc. They are not only a great entry to motorcycling but they are great motorcycles, I can see no reason to aspire to larger, heavier, quicker motorcycles unless you have a real need. Yes I run an ST1100, so there's a contradiction, but 40 bhp is not going to tour Europe 2 up with luggage for 4 weeks, more because the physical size than bhp, two adults and luggage need space on long days. The ST fully loaded is knocking on the door of half a tonne and delivers around 100 bhp, these little gems with an average rider weigh in at probably 250KG tops. With my man maths I make that 160 bhp per tonne, none too shabby.
You enjoy your modern 250's, 300's and 500's, and don't feel short changed, YOU'RE NOT.
FWIW.
UPT'NORTH.
13/11/2018 09:03:25 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
Hi MP. ?45 aint bad really. All they do on the very first service is change the oil and filter and make sure nothing has come loose. Here in the UK you *might* be able to get the first service for free as part of your deal but normally I'd expect to pay £60. I'm really pleased you're enjoying the bike.
Upt'North. I don't think your as committed to this small bike business you should be. You and the long suffering Mrs Upt'North need to prove your dedication by riding around Europe on a 125. I think the best bike for you both will be the Sachs MadAss. Plenty of space for luggage, a large comfortable seat, plenty of room to move around and a good tank capacity. I expect to see pictures of you and the good lady on a mountaintop in Bulgaria somewhere.
13/11/2018 10:47:53 UTC
Upt'North said :-
Well I know I could carry my just in case pants in my pocket but what about madames wardrobe?
All joshing apart, it's a great time for smaller capacity bikes.
Did I mention I'm 6'4 and 210 lbs. All muscle obviously.
Upt'North.
13/11/2018 11:12:03 UTC
Ren - The Ed said :-
6 feet 4 inches and 15 stone? Lightweight. I'm only 5 feet 8 inches and I weigh 12 stone 6, and that's on a good day. I'm all muscle. Well I am if you strip away the middle aged spread.
I was expecting you to say you'd use the Sachs as a spare carried in your top box. The solution to Madam's wardrobe is do what I did with Sharon. Teach her to ride then simply state "If it can go on your bike then you can take it".
13/11/2018 12:16:41 UTC
MP said :-
Finally I sold the mt03.the reason is that the naked bikes is not the best to ride.very uncomfortable.i look for one on off bike with low seat 770mm max up to 650cc.
Also sold the kymco dt350 and this is my new city commuter.
29/12/2019 02:56:27 UTC
Upt'North said :-
Is that a 400X MP?
Seat looks lush.
Upt'North.
29/12/2019 17:27:08 UTC
Ren - The Ed¹ said :-
Certainly looks like the 400X Upt'. Not come across this before, it's a fair thing ain't it. Even has a low seat option for Sharon. Love to hear what you think MP
https://www.bmw-motorrad.co.uk/en/models/urban_mobility/c400x.html...
29/12/2019 20:21:44 UTC
MP said :-
Yes the seat is extra.is the low comfort seat.is 1 cm lower than the original.i order as an extra ( 400 euro) because of yhe colour.is all black.the other is black grey.i wonder why bmw make the scooter with that ugly seat two tone colours.because I drove the scooter almost 1 month until the low seat comes is not so much low.almost as the original.but is much more beautiful.
The quality of driving of this scooter is the best of all the 400cc scooters.100 120 km/hour and is stable no matter the wind.an highways is ok.the top speed of this is about 160 .not bad at all.crouzing speed 100 120 very easy.in the traffic is unbelievable.205 kg and you think is only 100.i am 1.66.i do not make flat foot but is ok.
31/12/2019 15:34:17 UTC
Upt'North said :-
BMW obviously sell it with the awful standard seat because they wanted your €400.
They're not as stupid as you think.
Just in case you're wondering Ed, that's 5 and afe foot.
Upt'North.
31/12/2019 16:45:38 UTC
MP said :-
Upt'North you are right.but the colour of the seat is very easily solved with max 100 euro ( 80£ ) to make one new leather black cover with the same shape and stripes like the original.at bmw dealer they told me to make this in their shop but I preferred the original .also and the 1 cm lowering were included in this price.ok I prefer the original low seat.but the option to save 300 euro is at buyer's decision.
Happy new year to all off you.safe ride.
01/01/2020 02:47:34 UTC
Brenton Thorogood said :-
Hi ,I bought a 2019 mt 03 ( new ) for $5800 including on road costs ,I live in Australia ,I saved just over 1 thousand dollars because it is a 2019 model.these are a great bike to ride and are very zippy and comfortable to ride ,at 100kpm on the open road the bike has still lots of throttle left,once the bike is run in I am planning some open road cruising ,.I will give this bike a five out of five rating.
22/07/2020 04:50:11 UTC
Ren - The Ed¹ said :-
Cheers Brenton. It warms my heart to hear you're enjoying the MT03. Good call on buying the last year's model too and saving a grand.
22/07/2020 08:07:59 UTC
Name
Comment
Add a RELEVANT link (not required)
Upload an image (not required) -
Uploading...
Home
Bike Reviews